After a four-day trial filled with procedural delays, jurors reached a unanimous verdict on Thursday, finding Norman Mallory, 79, from Vernon, guilty of four counts, including repeated aggravated sexual assault. The defense attempted to undermine the credibility of the principal witness by suggesting they lied during testimony, but jurors were unconvinced by this argument.

Representing the state, Attorney Steven Brown and Deputy Attorney Dana Nevins described Mallory’s long-term sexual abuse of a minor, which continued even after the victim reached adulthood. They emphasized the profound courage it took for the accuser to testify, addressing intensely personal questions in front of a jury.

During closing arguments, Brown asserted that the victim had no incentive to fabricate the claims, pointing out the detrimental effects following their disclosure of the abuse, such as losing housing and financial support. The narrative presented by the prosecution described a systematic grooming process by Mallory that began when the victim was 16 years old.

In contrast, defense attorneys Albert Fox and Amanda Mowle critiqued the investigative work led by Det. Sgt. Mario Checchi, questioning the thoroughness of the case, particularly regarding the absence of DNA evidence and other potential leads. They pointed out discrepancies and inconsistencies in the witness’s statements while challenging the jury to consider these issues critically.

Fox highlighted a specific instance where the witness appeared to retract certain statements, which he claimed severely damaged their credibility. He argued that the prosecution’s case hinged on unreliable testimony and was fundamentally flawed.

The judge, Michael Kainen, deliberated on a mistrial motion presented by the defense but ultimately determined that it was up to the jury to assess the witness’s reliability. Furthermore, jurors were informed that some of the crimes occurred in New Hampshire, although local authorities did not have a related case against Mallory.

Days following the verdict, Windham County Sheriff Mark Anderson defended Checchi’s actions during the investigation, calling attacks on the investigative process a typical defense strategy. He commended the jury for their diligence and acknowledged the bravery of victims stepping forward in such challenging circumstances.

With sentencing pending, Mallory could face a minimum of ten years and a maximum of life imprisonment. The defense expressed its disappointment with the verdict and indicated plans to file post-trial motions, maintaining that the legal battle was not over.